DACI
DACI model offers a structured approach to decision-making that promotes efficient collaboration and clear accountability
DACI stands for Driver, Approver, Contributor, and Informed. This decision-making framework is designed to assign specific roles to team members, streamlining the process and leveraging individual strengths. By implementing DACI, teams can avoid decision paralysis and ensure that projects move forward smoothly.
Driver (D)
The Driver is responsible for managing the project’s progress. They schedule and run meetings, gather and distribute ideas, assign tasks, and track the team’s progress. While the Driver doesn’t have final approval authority, they play a crucial role in keeping the project on track and ensuring all team members are aligned.
Approver (A)
The Approver has the final say on project decisions. Typically a senior-level executive, the Approver reviews the work and makes the ultimate decision. By designating a single Approver, the DACI model eliminates confusion and speeds up the decision-making process.
Contributor (C)
Contributors are subject matter experts who provide valuable input and recommendations. They have a voice in the decision-making process but not a final vote. Contributors are selected based on their expertise and knowledge relevant to the project.
Informed (I)
The Informed are stakeholders who need to be kept updated on the project’s progress and final decisions. While they don’t actively participate in decision-making, they are affected by the outcomes and require regular updates.
Benefits of the DACI Approach
Implementing the DACI framework offers several advantages for team collaboration and project management:
- Clear accountability: By assigning specific roles, DACI eliminates ambiguity about who is responsible for what
- Streamlined decision-making: With a designated Approver, decisions can be made more quickly and efficiently
- Effective use of expertise: Contributors can provide valuable insights without slowing down the decision-making process
- Reduced conflict: Clear roles and responsibilities help minimize disagreements and power struggles within the team
- Improved communication: The framework ensures that all relevant stakeholders are kept informed throughout the project
- Enhanced trust: Team members understand their roles, leading to increased trust and collaboration
Example
Let’s explore an example of a software company planning to launch a new mobile app. Here’s a DACI matrix for this project, followed by context for each decision point:
| Decision/Task | Driver (D) | Approver (A) | Contributors (C) | Informed (I) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| App Features | Emily (PM) | David (CTO) | Alex (UX), Sarah (Dev), Mark (Marketing) | All department heads |
| UI Design | Alex (UX Lead) | Emily (PM) | Design team, Sarah (Dev), Mark (Marketing) | David (CTO), All department heads |
| Tech Stack | Sarah (Dev Lead) | David (CTO) | Dev team, Alex (UX) | Emily (PM), All department heads |
| Pricing Strategy | Mark (Marketing) | Lisa (CEO) | Finance team, Emily (PM) | David (CTO), All department heads |
| Launch Date | Emily (PM) | Lisa (CEO) | David (CTO), Sarah (Dev), Mark (Marketing) | All employees |
Context for each decision point:
- App Features: Emily, the Project Manager, drives the discussion on which features to include in the app. She gathers input from UX, Development, and Marketing teams. David, the CTO, has the final say on which features are technically feasible and align with the company’s strategy
- UI Design: Alex, the UX Lead, drives the design process, collaborating closely with the design team, developers, and marketing. Emily approves the final design to ensure it meets project goals and timelines
- Tech Stack: Sarah, the Development Lead, drives the decision on which technologies to use for building the app. She consults with her team and the UX lead. David, the CTO, makes the final decision based on long-term technical strategy and resource availability
- Pricing Strategy: Mark from Marketing leads the pricing discussion, working closely with the finance team and project manager. Lisa, the CEO, approves the final pricing strategy as it directly impacts the company’s revenue and market positioning
- Launch Date: Emily drives the launch date decision, coordinating with all teams to ensure readiness. Lisa, the CEO, has the final say on when to launch, considering market conditions and company-wide implications
This DACI matrix helps the team understand who’s responsible for driving each key decision, who needs to contribute their expertise, who makes the final call, and who needs to be kept in the loop. It streamlines the decision-making process and ensures that the right people are involved at the right stages of the project.
As demonstrated in the example, by implementing the DACI model, organizations can create a clear and definitive framework for group decisions. This approach ensures that team members’ talents are utilized effectively, the right people are making informed decisions, and projects move forward efficiently. With DACI, teams can avoid unnecessary arguments over the course of action, as each member understands their role in the project process.
Written by
Mithun Sridharan
Founder, LinkPress™
Mithun is a strategist, advisor, educator, and speaker focused on helping leaders make better decisions in environments shaped by change, complexity, and emerging technology. His work brings together leadership, management consulting, digital transformation, and artificial intelligence in a way that is practical, grounded, and commercially relevant.
Related Posts
RACI
RACI is a powerful tool used in project management and organizational planning to clarify roles and responsibilities
Mithun Sridharan SCOR Model
Driving Operational Excellence through integrated Supply Chain frameworks
Mithun Sridharan FAB Model
Translating technical capabilities into measurable customer outcomes
Mithun Sridharan